Aller au contenu
NNextHop
May 2026 edition - 34 providers analysed

The independent observatory of European digital sovereignty.

Measure, compare and explain the cloud dependency of European organisations. Public data, open methodology, monthly updates.

Live observatory

Public data updated continuously

Providers tracked

34

See details →

Average sovereignty score

50.5 / 100

See details →

Last change

recently

See details →

Downloadable datasets

3

See details →

Our mission

Documenting a strategic dependency, without dramatising or downplaying it.

NextHop exists because European digital sovereignty remains a poorly documented strategic topic. Public and private decision-makers lack quantified, neutral and up-to-date references to arbitrate their cloud choices.

Our approach is that of an observatory. Public data only, written methodology, versioned weightings. Every score is traceable and reproducible by a third party from the cited sources.

What we are not. Neither a think tank, nor a consultancy in disguise, nor a lobby. We publish measurable tools, not positions. Scored providers do not finance the platform.

34Providers analysed
13Sovereign-qualified (A+/A)
1987European datacenters
6Published analyses

Reference

What is digital sovereignty?

The ability of an organisation to control its data, its workloads and its technical dependencies, without being subject to the law or the arbitrations of a third-party state.

Jurisdiction

Which law applies to the provider. The US CLOUD Act and FISA 702 allow access to data hosted by US-controlled entities, even outside US territory.

Data

Where the data lives, who holds the keys, who encrypts it. EU residency, client-side key management, effective control over administrator access.

Technology

Open standards, workload portability, independence from a single vendor. Technical lock-in is as much a risk as legal exposure.

Read the full sovereignty primer →

Leaderboard

Top 5 sovereign providers

The 5 highest-rated providers in the panel across the 6 weighted criteria (jurisdiction, immunity, technology, data, certifications, openness).

See full ranking (in French) →

Who it serves

Who uses NextHop

Three audiences rely on the observatory daily, with distinct needs but a shared requirement for neutrality.

Public sector CIOs

Cloud procurement leaders, IT directors, CISOs. Need to compare, source and justify decisions.

Typical case: preparing a SecNumCloud or EUCS request for proposals.

Elected officials and policy staff

Parliamentarians, advisors, ministerial cabinets. Need a factual regulatory baseline.

Typical case: backing a bill on public procurement requirements.

Journalists and researchers

Tech newsrooms, academic think tanks, NGOs. Need to verify quantified claims independently.

Typical case: checking the real jurisdiction of a provider marketed as sovereign.

Methodology in brief

Four non-negotiable principles

The credibility of an observatory depends on its transparency. Here are the operating rules that apply to all our publications.

Public sources

No private data. Catalogue prices, official registries, regulatory documents.

Transparency

Written methodology, published weightings, public changelog.

Monthly updates

Automated price sync and quarterly panel resync.

Open code

Audit tools and import scripts available for independent review.

Read the full methodology →

Recent studies

Published analyses

L’AI Act ou l’art de réglementer son propre décrochageStudyL’AI Act ou l’art de réglementer son propre décrochageL’Europe a été la première à réglementer l’intelligence artificielle, mais elle risque d’être la dernière à la produire. Tandis que les États-Unis mobilisent le capital et que la Chine construit une filière industrielle intégrée, l’Union empile les normes, reporte leur application et accueille sur son sol les infrastructures des plateformes étrangères. Pour redevenir une puissance technologique, elle devra inverser l’ordre des priorités : construire la capacité avant de prétendre en fixer les règles. Microsoft–Mistral : l’Europe gagne un fournisseur, pas encore sa souverainetéStudyMicrosoft–Mistral : l’Europe gagne un fournisseur, pas encore sa souverainetéMicrosoft fournissait autrefois à Mistral les moyens d’entraîner ses modèles. Deux ans plus tard, le géant américain lui achète plusieurs milliards de dollars de capacité de calcul. Derrière ce spectaculaire renversement se dessine une opération plus ambiguë : Mistral gagne un client, un canal mondial et les moyens de financer ses infrastructures, mais s’expose à de nouvelles dépendances industrielles et commerciales. Semi-conducteurs : le rattrapage chinois déplace le rapport de forceStudySemi-conducteurs : le rattrapage chinois déplace le rapport de forceLe prototype chinois de lithographie EUV assemblé à Shenzhen ne menace pas encore la suprématie d’ASML. Mais il révèle un basculement plus profond : le verrou technologique se déplace vers la mémoire et l’agrégation, la Chine gagne du terrain sur les puces matures dont dépend l’industrie européenne, et l’Europe découvre que son principal actif stratégique reste largement administré depuis Washington.

Go further

Contribute or get in touch

An audit project, a data point to correct, a study to publish together. Write to us, we reply within 48 business hours.

100% independent. No advertising, no advertising tracking, no funding from scored providers.